The Song of the Alien Greys


This article, from yesterday’s issue of Britain’s Sunday Times newspaper, is quite timely. Its subject matter: the possibility that by searching for alien life we may actually cross paths with hostile ETs who may ultimately prove to be our downfall.

Coincidentally, I have, over the past few weeks, intended bringing to your attention a wierd book titled The Song of the Greys, which was written back in 1997 by Nigel Kerner. A copy of the book was sent to me some time ago by Danielle Silverman, who worked on the project.

I say “coincidentally” because, as with the Sunday Times’ article, The Song of the Greys offers a distinctly disturbing intent, and warning, behind the agenda of the ubiquitous Greys of wierd UFO lore.

Indeed, this is not a book that will sit well with those who are of a mindset suggesting that those pesky little Grey chaps are here to help us, to save the rain-forests, to cure cancer and/or to invite us to join some everlasting Cosmic Brotherhood where all is eternally well and everyone is blissfully happy. Nope, not at all.

Rather, The Song of the Greys is the stuff of nightmares.

I will not give away the whole story for those that haven’t read the book and who, after reading this post, may want to. But I will say this:

The reader will find certain things within the pages of The Song of the Greys that echo the words of Whitley Strieber in his abduction-related books: such as the claims that the Greys appear to have some understanding (and a deep one, too) of the afterlife, they seem to be very interested in the nature of the human soul, they have been with us for a very long time, they have possibly manipulated our affairs and development for countless centuries, and the image of them simply being alien scientists on a scouting mission from some far off world is completely and utterly wrong.

Yet, whereas Strieber’s books chiefly place the visitor phenomenon in a positive light, The Song of the Greys is, as the book’s cover blurb states: “The dark side of alien visitation.”

The essential thrust of the book is that the Greys are cold, ancient creatures: clone-like entities who, more than anything else, seek to understand and harness for their own ends the human soul. And, needless to say, none of this is good news for us, as a species.

Quite literally, the Greys are soul-less, in Nigel Kerner’s hypothesis. However, they realize that the Human Race does possess a soul and that life goes on after physical death. As a result, they are seeking to use us and to manipulate us (genetically, emotionally, physically and much more) in an effort to provide them with the one thing they lack: souls of their own. Precisely what motivates them, I will let you discover for yourselves…

The book delves deeply into the issue of how such soul-stealing, or manipulation at least, may occur. It reveals a great deal about sinister creatures with equally sinister agendas that many within the UFO community will find unsettling (but, hey, there’s nothing wrong with thatthe subject needs shaking up).

And it delves into areas of profound interest: (a) ancient texts, beliefs and religions; (b) the possible nature of an afterlife and how and why the Greys came to infiltrate, manipulate and ultimately farm our civilization for nefarious purposes; (c) how the UFO community has been utterly deceived by these devious beings; and (d) the way in which certain people in the official world, deeply aware of the truth behind “alien visitations,” have sought to keep the unsettling facts from us.

Has Nigel Kerner cracked the secret of the Greys? Frankly, I don’t know. I do know, however, that his views are most definitely shared by certain persons who worked in the Pentagon, the US Air Force and the Defense Intelligence Agency and who suspected as much as far back as the 1970s.

I also know that in our search for the truth about the Greys we should not ignore those possibilities that some might see as frightening and/or controversial.

The Song of the Greys may very well radically shift your perspective on the UFO presence, the nature of alien abduction, and the Grey intent.

Charles Fort’s famous words, “We are property,” may have been closer to the truth than he could ever have imagined…

Sheep Form Circle


About 100 woolly sheep formed a perfect ring while grazing in a field in England on Friday, baffling the farmer and other witnesses, the Daily Mail reports.

I couldn’t believe what I was seeing,” said Russell Bird, who photographed the bizarre occurrence.

He continued: “I did see a dog worrying sheep nearby beforehand and the dog ran off round the hedge in a different field, so I don’t know if they were discussing that.

As the farmer’s tractor approached, however, the sheep scattered, but another circle was formed three fields away. Both formations lasted about 10 minutes, the Daily Mail reports.

Farm manager at Herefordshire College of Technology, Dan Seaborne, said: “I just think they’ve been fed with dry feed in that shape; you can get snacker feeders now and you tow behind a quad and it drops pellets on the ground.

BIGFOOT PRANK ALMOST RESULTS IN TRAGEDY!


BIGFOOT PRANK ALMOST RESULTS IN TRAGEDY! December 12, 2007 – WTVY NEWS of Alabama has reported that a teenager wearing a BIGFOOT suit alarmed several residents, who armed themselves with shotguns and headed to where the prank was taking place. The pranksters, ranging in age from 18-to-23, were given a warning. Sheriff’s officials say those involved in any copycat incidents will face reckless endangerment charges. This incident comes on the heels of recent HAIRY HOMNID sightings in the area.

Clintons played the cryptozoology card!


According to the Associated Press, Bill Clinton speaking in Macon, Georgia, on Monday, January 21, 2008, played the cryptozoology card!

The AP is reporting: “Bill Clinton doesn’t want to become the White House’s Sasquatch.”

The news service noted the former president says it would be a mistake for him to have a specific job if he were to return to Washington D.C. with a new Clinton administration.

In remarks to reporters, Clinton said:

I’d be like the Abominable Snowman. I’d be Bigfooting everybody even if I tried not to. There’s almost no way you can avoid that. Whatever I do should be totally transparent.
Bill Clinton, January 21, 2008.

Asked if he would live in the White House, Clinton said, “I would anticipate being there, unless you know something I don’t.”

What do you think Clinton meant by “Bigfooting” everyone?

What is obvious is the Clintons are after the cryptozoology vote now too ~ just as they were in pursuit of the ufological one in the past.

American Bigfoot

Though sightings of the North American Bigfoot date back to the 1830s (Bord 1982), interest in Bigfoot grew rapidly during the second half of the twentieth century. This was spurred on by many magazine articles of the time, most seminally a December 1959 True magazine article describing the discovery of large, mysterious footprints the year before in Bluff Creek, California.
A half century later, the question of Bigfoot’s existence remains open. Bigfoot is still sought, the pursuit kept alive by a steady stream of sightings, occasional photos or footprint finds, and sporadic media coverage. But what evidence has been gathered over the course of fifty years? And what conclusions can we draw from that evidence?

Most Bigfoot investigators favor one theory of Bigfoot’s origin or existence and stake their reputations on it, sniping at others who don’t share their views. Many times, what one investigator sees as clear evidence of Bigfoot another will dismiss out of hand. In July 2000, curious tracks were found on the Lower Hoh Indian Reservation in Washington state. Bigfoot tracker Cliff Crook claimed that the footprints werefor sure a Bigfoot,” though Jeffrey Meldrum, an associate professor of biological sciences at Idaho State University (and member of the Bigfoot Field Research Organization, BFRO) decided that there was not enough evidence to pursue the matter (Big Disagreement Afoot 2000). A set of tracks found in Oregon’s Blue Mountains have also been the source of controversy within the community. Grover Krantz maintains that they constitute among the best evidence for Bigfoot, yet longtime researcher Rene Dahinden claimed thatany village idiot can see [they] are fake, one hundred percent fake” (Dennett 1994).

And while many Bigfoot researchers stand by the famous 16 mm Patterson film (showing a large manlike creature crossing a clearing) as genuine (including Dahinden, who shared the film’s copyright), others including Crook join skeptics in calling it a hoax. In 1999, Crook found what he claims is evidence in the film of a bell-shaped fastener on the hip of the alleged Bigfoot, evidence that he suggests may be holding the ape costume in place (Dahinden claimed the object is matted feces) (Hubbell 1999).

Regardless of which theories researchers subscribe to, the question of Bigfoot’s existence comes down to evidence- and there is plenty of it. Indeed, there are reams of documents about Bigfoot-filing cabinets overflowing with thousands of sighting reports, analyses, and theories. Photographs have been taken of everything from the alleged creature to odd tracks left in snow to twisted branches. Collections exist of dozens or hundreds of footprint casts from all over North America. There is indeed no shortage of evidence.

The important criterion, however, is not the quantity of the evidence, but the quality of it. Lots of poor quality evidence does not add up to strong evidence, just as many cups of weak coffee cannot be combined into a strong cup of coffee.

Bigfoot evidence can be broken down into four general types: eyewitness sightings, footprints, recordings, and somatic samples (hair, blood, etc.). Some researchers (notably Loren Coleman 1999) also place substantial emphasis on folklore and indigenous legends. The theories and controversies within each category are too complex and detailed to go into here. I present merely a brief overview and short discussion of each; anyone interested in the details is encouraged to look further.

1. Eyewitness Accounts
Eyewitness accounts and anecdotes comprise the bulk of Bigfoot evidence. This sort of evidence is also the weakest. Lawyers, judges, and psychologists are well aware that eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable. As Ben Roesch, editor of The Cryptozoological Review, noted in an article in Fortean Times, “Cryptozoology is based largely on anecdotal evidence. . . . [W]hile physical phenomena can be tested and systematically evaluated by science, anecdotes cannot, as they are neither physical nor regulated in content or form. Because of this, anecdotes are not reproducible, and are thus untestable; since they cannot be tested, they are not falsifiable and are not part of the scientific process. . . . Also, reports usually take place in uncontrolled settings and are made by untrained, varied observers. People are generally poor eyewitnesses, and can mistake known animals for supposed cryptids [unknown animals] or poorly recall details of their sighting. . . . Simply put, eyewitness testimony is poor evidence” (Roesch 2001).

Bigfoot investigators acknowledge that lay eyewitnesses can be mistaken, but counter that expert testimony should be given much more weight. Consider Coleman’s (1999) passage reflecting on expert eyewitness testimony: “[E]ven those scientists who have seen the creatures with their own eyes have been reluctant to come to terms with their observations in a scientific manner.As an example he gives the account ofmycologist Gary Samuelsand his brief sighting of a large primate in the forest of Guyana. The implication is that this exacting man of science accurately observed, recalled, and reported his experience. And he may have. But Samuels is a scientific expert on tiny fungi that grow on wood. His expertise is botany, not identifying large primates in poor conditions. Anyone, degreed or not, can be mistaken.

bigfoot sasquatch

What are the undisputed facts about the bigfoot / sasquatch mystery?
It’s a fact that for more than 400 years people have reported seeing large, hair-covered, man-like animals in the wilderness areas of North America.

It is a fact that sightings of these animals continue today. Real or not, these reports are often made by people of unimpeachable character.

It is a fact that, for over seventy years, people have been finding, photographing, and casting sets of very large human-shaped tracks. Most are discovered by chance in remote areas. These tracks continue to be found to this day.

It is a fact that the cultural histories of many Native American and First Nation peoples include stories and beliefs about non-humanpeoplesof the wild. Many of these descriptions bear a striking resemblance to the hairy man-like creatures reported today.

These are some of the facts. There is, however, much disagreement as to what these facts mean.

To many, these facts, taken together, suggest the presence of an animal, probably a primate, that exists today in very low population densities. If true, this species, having likely evolved alongside humans, became astonishingly adept at avoiding human contact through a process of natural selection.

To others, these same facts point to a cultural phenomenon kept alive today through a combination of the misidentification of known animals, wishful thinking, and the deliberate fabrication of evidence.

Anabolic Steroids

Anabolic Steroids may be something you might want to try im learning alot about them
A friend recently invited me to join the isteroids.com forums! Its very interesting if you want to buy steroids or learn about Anabolic Steroids or effects of steroids, anabolic steroids, human growth hormone, anadrol, steroid cycles and many other topics then by all means check out their website and steroid information forums.

Buy Steroids

There is a cool new way to buy steroids online have you visited Steroids-Pharmacy.com? Shopping for steroids online is a very popular way of getting steroids discreetly and in the privacy of their own homes. However, if you are going to buy steroids, you should be careful! The internet is full of alot of websites claiming they will sell you real anabolic steroids. Most are lying, and if you buy steroids from them, the drugs you’ll get will probably be fake.

But you can what you want at Steroids-Pharmacy.com Buy Steroids Everything from Winstrol, Deca Durabolin, Sustanon, Anadrol, Dianabol, Anavar, and Equipoise are available. Don’t forget their selection of masteron and clenbuterol.

Reccomended by Paranormal Hunter

Clenbuterol

From time to time paranormal hunter comes across a service or product thats so good we have to tell some one about it. Recently i was introduced to Clenbuterol.

Specifically, it’s used for fat loss, and since we’re talking about fat loss here, and this purpose is what it’s most often used for by athletes. Briefly stated, Clen is used as a repartitioning agent, and what this means is simply that it will increase your ratio of Fat Free Mass (FFM) to Fat Mass (FM) (1). When you use Clen, besides (of course) noticing some fat loss, you’ll feel your body temperature rise a bit, and your appetite will be slightly repressed. Great for body building.

You can visit my friends website and learn more about it. One of the most amazing fat loss drugs sold in pharmacies its called Clenbuterol , it’s a revolutionary bodybuilding drug. Clenbuterol is reccomended and endorsed by Paranormal Hunter.